🚨Trump exposes CIA backdoor created by Obama!

Stephen Gardner and Alex Newman claim that the Obama administration enabled a secret CIA “backdoor” through USAID funds, allegedly used to finance anti-Trump efforts and left-leaning media outlets like the New York Times and Politico. They argue Democrats have funneled taxpayer money into projects benefiting their political interests—such as “woke” schools, sanctuary cities, and media subscriptions—and that Trump, alongside Elon Musk and Attorney General Pam Bondi, is trying to expose and end this corruption. They cite Senator Ed Markey’s call for mass protests against Trump and Musk, contrasting it with Trump’s own calls for peaceful demonstrations. They also highlight Trump’s move away from global institutions (World Economic Forum, WHO, Paris Climate Accord) as part of his broader plan to cut off alleged Democrat strongholds.

Below is a concise, SEO-friendly summary that distills the main points from Stephen Gardner’s discussion, incorporates relevant figures and themes, and sprinkles in key political keywords. It presents the allegations, notes where they come from, and highlights the broader political narrative—while making it clear these claims are not confirmed facts but rather points of debate.

---

Trump Exposes Alleged CIA “Backdoor” from Obama Era

Recent commentary from Stephen Gardner (Taming Wall Street) and Alex Newman (author of Deep State: The Invisible Government Behind the Scenes) suggests that Donald Trump has uncovered a CIA “backdoor” allegedly created during the Obama Administration. According to these political corruption claims, funds from USAid were covertly funneled to various media outlets—including the New York Times and Politico—which then produced critical coverage of Trump and Republicans. In this scenario, the CIA purportedly used USAid to orchestrate attacks that contributed to Trump’s impeachment efforts.

Alleged USAID Corruption and Democratic Resistance

Critics of the Democratic Party argue that recent events—such as Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer warning voters that Trump is stealing private information—are designed to distract from deeper issues. Those issues revolve around alleged “swamp” tactics involving taxpayer money and media subsidies. Some conservatives say Democrats are using public funds to bolster friendly outlets and sustain coverage that portrays Trump Administration policies negatively.

Conflicting Narratives on Protest Calls

Meanwhile, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) is shown in clips calling for citizens to “fight” and gather in large numbers in Washington DC to oppose both Trump and Elon Musk—the head of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Supporters of Trump draw parallels between these remarks and Trump’s own call to “peacefully and patriotically” rally on January 6, 2021, questioning whether Democratic language meets the same condemnation.

Efforts to Pull Back from Global Bodies

Stephen Gardner and Alex Newman also discuss Trump’s past moves to extricate the United States from organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Paris Climate Accord. They view these bodies as part of an overarching global agenda that Trump and Musk aim to curtail. Republicans such as Marco Rubio, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Ron DeSantis largely support scaling back the U.S.’s involvement in what they label “globalist” policies.

Education, Sanctuary Cities, and Budget Overhauls

The conversation extends to President Trump’s call to shut down the Department of Education—a move critics say could undermine public schools (which predominantly support Democratic candidates through donations). AG Pam Bondi’s reported crackdown on over 200 “sanctuary cities” further points to a broader attempt to defund institutions perceived as aligned with Democrats. These actions are framed as cutting off “massive strongholds” where taxpayer money is allegedly abused at the expense of economic policies that would benefit average Americans.

Media Outlets and Federal Subsidies

The theory continues that leading news organizations like the New York Times and Reuters received millions in funding from USAID or related agencies—particularly during the Obama Administration—thereby compromising their editorial independence. Similar allegations extend to outlets such as Politico, which some claim took around $8 million in federal subsidies before publishing critiques of the Trump Administration and Republican Party policies.

Key Takeaways & Ongoing Debate

1. Deep State Allegations: Critics say there is a “deep state” network funneling federal money to media outlets to influence political narratives.
2. USAID Under Fire: USAID funds were weaponized against President Trump by funding hit pieces and facilitating impeachment.
3. Republicans Stephen Gardner and Alex Newman claim that the Obama administration enabled a secret CIA “backdoor” through USAID funds, allegedly used to finance anti-Trump efforts and left-leaning media outlets like the New York Times and Politico. They argue Democrats have funneled taxpayer money into projects benefiting their political interests—such as “woke” schools, sanctuary cities, and media subscriptions—and that Trump, alongside Elon Musk and Attorney General Pam Bondi, is trying to expose and end this corruption. They cite Senator Ed Markey’s call for mass protests against Trump and Musk, contrasting it with Trump’s own calls for peaceful demonstrations. They also highlight Trump’s move away from global institutions (World Economic Forum, WHO, Paris Climate Accord) as part of his broader plan to cut off alleged Democrat strongholds.